» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Honda Forum / Acura Forum - SuperHonda.com > Honda News, Honda Forum News, Acura news, Acura Forum News > SH Rumors & AutoNews Talk
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Gallery Video Sales Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

SuperHonda.com is the premier Honda Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2005, 07:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Shiba-Kun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So.Calif. USA
Posts: 33,535
Car:
Mods:
Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?Shiba-Kun you're still here?
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged

2006 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged

Written by: Tom Jensen

Harrisburg, NC – 12/1/2005 The 2006 Chevy Cobalt SS Supercharged delivers riveting performance on a budget. (Photo: GM Media)

WHAT TO LIKE: Fast, inexpensive and worthy of the “SS” name, makes you feel 16 again

WHAT TO CHANGE: A little too much testosterone, especially in the bat wing out back, makes you look 16 again



In the automotive world, there is no such thing as too many fun automobiles, especially ones that are affordable for the masses.

Meet the 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt SS.

The Cobalt line, which was introduced in late 2004, is Chevrolet’s replacement for the late, unlamented Cavalier, which had been hanging around since 1982.

As you might expect, the entry-level Cobalt comes in a dizzying array of models in two- and four-door varieties. There are entry-level (LS), mid-level (LT) and high-performance Cobalt (SS) flavors available as either coupes or sedans. There’s also the sedan-only luxury LTZ and our tester — and the only Cobalt model you should care about — the coupe-only Cobalt SS Supercharged.

As you’ve doubtless discerned already, what sets the Supercharged Cobalt model apart from the regular SS model is a supercharged motor. Specifically, the hot rod model comes with a 2.4-liter, 205-horsepower motor, a full 20-percent more power than the base 171-horse SS motor provides.

In official Chevy-speak, this is known as the Ecotec 2.0L SC motor. Its power increase comes from an Eaton M62 supercharger, with maximum boost pressure of12 pounds per square inch (psi). The system includes an air-to-water intercooler that cools the incoming air charge to increase intake-charge density, which in turn enhances power and reduces the engine’s propensity to “knock” at high boost levels.

What this means for the driver is a seriously fast little hatchback coupe. The SS S rockets from zero to 60 miles per hour in just 6.2 seconds, which is genuine sports car territory.

Standard with this hi-po motor is a short-throw five-speed manual transmission that works nearly flawlessly. The combination makes for a car with a badass personality – and I mean that in a good way — a quick little coupe with just enough rough edges to feel like a baby Z28.

To harness that power in the corners, the Cobalt SS S features an impressively upgraded roster of suspension components.

Known collectively as the FE5 suspension, the Cobalt SS S comes standard with a 24-mm front stabilizer bar and 22-mm rear stabilizer bar, higher-rate springs and bushings, four-wheel disc brakes, monotube shocks and 18-inch forged aluminum wheels with complementing low-profile P215/45R18 Z-rated high-performance tires.

Every Cobalt comes with a much stiffer body structure than the old Cavaliers had, and increased body stiffness means improved handling.

The FE5 suspension gives the SS S the ability to grip the road ferociously and the standard anti-lock brakes make it stop well, too. The bottom line here is a car that’s great fun to drive in a distinctly American flavor: The Cobalt SS S isn’t as a smooth and refined as, say, an Acura RS-X or even a Volkswagen GTI, but what the Chevrolet lacks in finesse it more than makes up for in brute strength and sheer fun. It’ll put a smile on your face like you were back in high school, doing parking-lot burnouts in a ’69 Chevelle SS.

Unfortunately, though, not only will you have the goofy smile of a juvenile delinquent when you drive the Cobalt SS S, you’ll look the part, too.

That’s because another standard feature is a rear wing/spoiler out back that’s big enough to have come from either the Batmobile or an IndyCar. Seriously, if you’re age 16-19, you’ll probably think the junk above the trunk is way cool. If you’re any older, though, it’ll just look silly.
The otherwise clean interior design features a triangle-shaped vertical column that sticks up perpendicular to the steering column.

By the same token, the otherwise clean interior design features a triangle-shaped vertical column that sticks up perpendicular to the steering column. On it are two set of three lights (two yellow and one red) that flash in ascending order as supercharger pressure builds. The best way to describe it is to say it looks a lot like the “Christmas tree” timing lights the NHRA uses at the starting line of drag races.

Taken as a whole, the Cobalt SS S feels like a car created by one of GM’s best engineers, who let his 13-year-old son finish the final design details.

But maybe that’s just the old guy in me talking. The Cobalt SS S has the performance credentials to make an impression in the rapidly growing tuner market, and perhaps the visual excesses give it street cred, too.

You can even get it with some options normally found on much more expensive cars, including leather seats, XM radio, MP3 capability and OnStar.

Regardless of where you fall on the issues of the boy-racer rear wing and instrumentation, one indisputable fact is that the Cobalt SS Supercharged delivers riveting performance on a budget, which in my book makes it worthy of the SS name.


SPEC SHEET: Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged
TYPE: Front-wheel-drive coupe
SEATING CAPACITY: four
ENGINE: 2.4-liter supercharged four-cylinder
HORSEPOWER: 205
TORQUE: 200
GEARBOX: Five-speed manual
ZERO TO 60 MPH: 6.2 seconds
EPA FUEL MILEAGE: 23 city/29 highway
BASE PRICE/AS-TESTED: $21,430/$23,085








__________________



http://www.fullclipusa.com/store/

SHO Premium Member #1.
Shiba-Kun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-06-2005, 10:56 AM   #2 (permalink)
BlackMoon Ninja
 
brady33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Ank
Posts: 834
Car: 1998 Civic LX
Mods: Cosmetic
brady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep troposphere
...maybe I'm not reading closely enough, but what exactly has changed between 05 and 06?

And what exactly is a Cobalt SS S and an Acura RS-X?
__________________
'05 Honda Odyssey EX-L RES, Sagebrush
'98 Honda Civic LX, White
brady33 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 11:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
SH Virus
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,175
Car: 1997 Volvo 850 GLT Estate
Mods: Simple mods
dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?dodolaje What did you do to deserve all this rep?
Quote:
Originally Posted by brady33
...maybe I'm not reading closely enough, but what exactly has changed between 05 and 06?

And what exactly is a Cobalt SS S and an Acura RS-X?
hahahahah SSS wow.. super slow n shitty? RS-X is dat a new model?
__________________
Good-bye 1990 Honda Accord Sedan LX
Good-bye 1991 Honda Accord Sedan EX
Good-bye 1992 Honda Accord Coupe LX
Good-bye 1993 Honda Prelude VTEC
Good-bye 1994 Acura Legend GS

1997 Volvo 850 GLT Wagon right now. Looking for the right Honda/Acura to come back to the family.
dodolaje is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 11:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
BlackMoon Ninja
 
brady33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Ank
Posts: 834
Car: 1998 Civic LX
Mods: Cosmetic
brady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep tropospherebrady33 In the rep troposphere
Quote:
Originally Posted by dodolaje
hahahahah SSS wow.. super slow n shitty? RS-X is dat a new model?
Well if you break down the Acura model, you've got an RS which signifies the trim level of the old Integras, then they're taking some influence from Nissan where the X model in the XTerra is the super-cheapo version. So the Acura RS-X must be like a base RSX with no power windows or locks, no keyless entry, and a CVT.
__________________
'05 Honda Odyssey EX-L RES, Sagebrush
'98 Honda Civic LX, White
brady33 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 11:28 AM   #5 (permalink)
Ninja Matsume
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Fl
Posts: 3,633
Car: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
Mods: Stock
xtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sad
I'd take an SRT-4 over the Cobalt SS.
__________________
xtremefusion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 01:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
Digital Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 805, CA
Posts: 722
Car: 2005 rsx-s
Mods: Boogers and road kill
vueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a lifevueboy5 You need a life
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremefusion
I'd take an SRT-4 over the Cobalt SS.
__________________

2005 PWP Rsx-S
Pics of the Car
vueboy5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 03:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
SH Silver
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fort Wort Tx
Posts: 200
Car:
Mods:
TheX-Man is an unknown quantity at this point
didn't the 2005s use either a 2.0 or 2.2 s/c?
__________________
Gone: Blown Integra GSR
Current: Stock Civic ex =(
TheX-Man is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 03:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
BlackMoon Ninja
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Igloo-land
Posts: 853
Car: 1998 Breeze, OH YEA
Mods:
bojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud ofbojacks has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheX-Man
didn't the 2005s use either a 2.0 or 2.2 s/c?
i think it was a 2.0 ecotec, ha, .4 increase in displaement no increase in hp. but i PRAY it did something to the torque.
bojacks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 05:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
Dark Wind
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 5,514
Car: 1979 Porsche 911SC, 95 Chevy S-10, 2 1990 Miatas
Mods: Don't you wish you knew
hobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problem
They did a comparo on R&T of the RSX vs the Cobalt SS:

The Cobalt won the performance section by a hair, the RSX-S won the subjective part by a hair.

RSX-S -- Cobalt SS
Stopping 60-0 -- 132 -- 118
stopping 80-0 -- 235 -- 212
0-60 -- 6.7 -- 6.2
0-100 -- 16.6 -- 15.9
1/4 mile -- 15.0@94.9 -- 14.8@96.8
Skidpad -- .83g -- .84g
Slalom -- 67.1mph -- 66.9mph
fuel economy -- 22.3mpg -- 22.3mpg
price as tested --$24,240 -- $23,910

Tested 9/2005

So they're tied in real fuel economy, the RSX-S wins the slalom, and the Cobalt SS wins ALL of the other categories. The Cobalt, it should be noted, also has much more usable power lower in the rev band due to the supercharger. The RSX-S is a nice car, but dont count the Cobalt SS out. Its every bit as fast and faster, a hair cheaper, and, IMO, the styling of the RSX-S is kind of bland, while the Cobalt is a bit more bold.
hobie237 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 05:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Rick V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,939
Car:
Mods:
Rick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to do
sorry if im not the least bit impressed with 205hp from a supercharged 2.4 liter on 12psi from a reletivly large m62 blower.....
__________________
i dont know shit
Rick V is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 05:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ninja Matsume
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Fl
Posts: 3,633
Car: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
Mods: Stock
xtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick V
sorry if im not the least bit impressed with 205hp from a supercharged 2.4 liter on 12psi from a reletivly large m62 blower.....
To the Cobalts defense, they are slightly underrated.
__________________
xtremefusion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 06:06 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Rick V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 1,939
Car:
Mods:
Rick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to doRick V Rep God/Goddess with nothing better to do
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremefusion
To the Cobalts defense, they are slightly underrated.

sorry i dont care if they are WAY underrated. an m62 is the same blower size jackson racing uses for a h22 and with 6psi most are making 225 whp at 9psi most make 250+, with no aftercooler and bullshit fuel management. also when i was thinking about buying just an m62 blower from eaton to attempt fitting it different then the jrsc kit i remember reading thier efficiency charts and at 12psi i distinctly remember the blower being WAY out of its efficiency range

sorry but my grandfather is a service manager at a large chevy dealer and i have been in most of the newer cars made in the past 10 years and to date only the corvette doesnt feel like a cheap piece of shit. on and i forgot also the diesel trucks...the duramax is nice with the allison.
__________________
i dont know shit
Rick V is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 06:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Dark Wind
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 5,514
Car: 1979 Porsche 911SC, 95 Chevy S-10, 2 1990 Miatas
Mods: Don't you wish you knew
hobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problemhobie237 has a Rep problem
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremefusion
To the Cobalts defense, they are slightly underrated.

And deliberately underpowered. The Turbo on the STi is WAY too small compared to what it could be. I have not checked out the Cobalt is similarly underpowered, perhaps by the piping? Exhaust? I dont know. The Mazdaspeed Miata and Mazdaspeed6 had their compressor sides of their turbos undersized, and the exhaust built so that they spool inefficiently. Stockers that are boosted are under-powered and de-engineered.

Why? Insurance costs mostly.
hobie237 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 06:40 PM   #14 (permalink)
SuperHonda Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Comfort
Posts: 156
Car:
Mods:
Falcon21 is a glorious beacon of lightFalcon21 is a glorious beacon of lightFalcon21 is a glorious beacon of lightFalcon21 is a glorious beacon of lightFalcon21 is a glorious beacon of light
To Do List
1. Remove ugly thing on trunk.
2. Skip #1 and buy a better car.
__________________
1999 Accord LX - Totaled
1994 Mazda RX7
3" Downpipe
Midpipe
Racing Beat dual tip "catback" <-
Falcon21 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 06:53 PM   #15 (permalink)
Ninja Matsume
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pembroke Pines, Fl
Posts: 3,633
Car: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX
Mods: Stock
xtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sadxtremefusion is sad...just sad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick V
sorry i dont care if they are WAY underrated. an m62 is the same blower size jackson racing uses for a h22 and with 6psi most are making 225 whp at 9psi most make 250+, with no aftercooler and bullshit fuel management. also when i was thinking about buying just an m62 blower from eaton to attempt fitting it different then the jrsc kit i remember reading thier efficiency charts and at 12psi i distinctly remember the blower being WAY out of its efficiency range
Thats simple. Its because the H22 already has relatively high compression from the factory and supercharging it would yield better numbers than one that has lower compression from the factory such as the Cobalts engine. That is why the H22 needs less boost to make better numbers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobie237
And deliberately underpowered. The Turbo on the STi is WAY too small compared to what it could be. I have not checked out the Cobalt is similarly underpowered, perhaps by the piping? Exhaust? I dont know. The Mazdaspeed Miata and Mazdaspeed6 had their compressor sides of their turbos undersized, and the exhaust built so that they spool inefficiently. Stockers that are boosted are under-powered and de-engineered.

Why? Insurance costs mostly.
I wouldn't say its completely underpowered. Its ok, but its nothing extraordinary. Had it been turbocharged from the factory like the SRT-4, maybe we might have seen better numbers. Supercharging 4 cyl motors =

I do agree that the VF39 is too small for the STi, hence why I opted for the Evo9. STi's stock turbo are good up to 300awhp with bolt ons (engine management and a turboback exhaust).

And I wouldn't say that factory boosted cars are underpowered either. SRT-4's and the new Evo IX are great examples that dyno impressive numbers and are underrated from the factory. (SRT-4's are rated at 230 at the crank when in reality they dyno the same numbers at the wheels, while the new Evo IX are dynoing around 240-250awhp on a Mustang Dyno and around 270awhp on a Dynojet.)
__________________
xtremefusion is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2