96 Camaro SS vs. Mercedes ??? - Page 3 - Honda Forum / Acura Forum

user12 · 05-24-2009, 11:45 AM

cool - CAI and a catback take an LT1 up to over 300. (and even more TQ)

its like gm had to figure out a way to knock 30hp off the engine before it left the production line... and they did it with an intake for a 4cly and muffler stuffed with wet t-shirts.

user12 · 05-24-2009, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Civictuner1

no, i got nitto 555's on the back. i usually run them at about 25-26psi. they dead hook on 22psi, which broke the axel and rearend.

yeeeeeeeep drag radials will make quick work of the rear end.

you have an auto or a T56?

you are going to FLY with 4.11s

Darkness · 05-24-2009, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by user12

cool - CAI and a catback take an LT1 up to over 300. (and even more TQ)

its like gm had to figure out a way to knock 30hp off the engine before it left the production line... and they did it with an intake for a 4cly and muffler stuffed with wet t-shirts.

but whp wise it's only about 250-260 ish and weighs more than 500 lbs than my car making near the same hp and my tq is flat

Civictuner1 · 05-24-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by user12

muffler stuffed with wet t-shirts.

lol. But yes its a t-56.

96civic3door · 05-24-2009, 07:14 PM

My old 94 bolt on M6 Formula ran a best of 3.6, cold air intake, colder thermostat, and a cat back. That was hooking decent with 19 to 2.0 60 foot times, street tires. The C5 ran the 12.68 before the bolt ons and tune with a low 1.9 60 foot but my LS1 trapped alot higher than my old LT1.(112mph vs 102mph). The LT1's dont breath very well up top no matter what bolt on's you do. The heads, cam, and intake are aimed at low to mid range rpm's.

user12 · 05-25-2009, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVU97GS-R

but whp wise it's only about 250-260 ish and weighs more than 500 lbs than my car making near the same hp and my tq is flat

let me know when it looks like this

9400rpms · 05-25-2009, 09:36 AM

um.
If this is the same guy i'm thinking off of a local forum.

I'll vouch for his lt1 running 12.7's or w/e he claims. He has the slips to prove it and i saw it at IFO.. his car has no problem on a juice running 11's now everyone stfu.

Darkness · 05-25-2009, 12:49 PM

it will when i drop an ls2 into it :-P

user12 · 05-25-2009, 02:30 PM

are you hinting at something?

Civictuner1 · 05-25-2009, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 9400rpms

um.
If this is the same guy i'm thinking off of a local forum.

I'll vouch for his lt1 running 12.7's or w/e he claims. He has the slips to prove it and i saw it at IFO.. his car has no problem on a juice running 11's now everyone stfu.

its me. my car was actually running like ass that day.

user12 · 05-25-2009, 04:31 PM

and there we have it!!

LT1!

96civic3door · 05-25-2009, 07:30 PM

96civic3door · 05-25-2009, 07:32 PM

Double post, Speaking on the GM power plants I got a chance to run against a stock C6 Z06 at the track on Saturday

user12 · 05-26-2009, 08:54 AM

how did that turn out?

96civic3door · 05-26-2009, 08:48 PM

Got beat but his 1/8 mile killed mine. I was realing him in the last 300 feet of the track. The car I was driving pulled a 116 trap to his 121 but on the logs off the computer shows that at about 12.4 second into the run our car had knock and the speed dropped from 119 to 108 then picked up another 8mph. You could feel it to. I ran a 12.7 he ran a 12.1, I would not have beat him anyway but it felt good being that close to the bumper of a proven 500hp car.