Originally posted by h22apower I think the spec v could beat it with a good driver. they have a ton of torque and a limited slip differential.
Finally some people that aren't only Honda driven...people just don't want to see the fact that teh Spec V is faster then what people say. Specs are putting down 1/4 times of low 15s and thats about the same with rsx-s' just because the rsx-s cost some 6-8 thousand more doesn't make it automatically faster then the Spec...sigh..I guess this is a Honda board so bias answers...
Jason
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Arctic Blue Pearl
I know I saw a rs-x type S with an injen intake put down a mighty 15.4 1/4 mile. Spec V's are quick that's coming from my brother he used to drive a b16a rex.
__________________
(drive it like you hate it) MT
My car: sold- 93 integra ls
96 honda civic hatchback jdm h22a lsd tranny
Originally posted by Iamthebull hahaha. dang both those cars are slow! i killed a brand new sentra Se-r and i raped him bad! i have been in races within the past 3 days, and those were against, stock 91 SHO like mine, 94 automatic SHO with intake, exhaust, and rims, mr2 (the one before the mr-s), civic with rims, SOHC vtec, and intake, new toyota celica GT, the sentra, and a newer mustang GT. I won all of those races except for the one against the GT mustang. it got me by about 3 cars. fun fun!
-Daniel 91 SHO
Why will a brand new SE-R race u? It's bad for the new engine.
Reread what u wrote plz? I was having a hard time reading it : So do u own a mr2? or a civic? huh? :
__________________ Sex Topic Uploads:
enough p*rns
"...you rep me & i rep you, just spreadn teh luv"
'02 Accord SE
'91 Integra RS
Originally posted by lilazianracer03
keep street racing and send more videos
its cool but did the civic us NoS??????
that civic was actually mine....i was using a 55 shot Zex kit and my bottle pressure was really low and under 800 psi so i was probably only spraying like a 20 shot which does practically nothing. The kit is very finicky depending on bottle pressure. I raced that spec v (my friend matt) a bunch of other times and i usually put about 2 on him when i had a full bottle and it was warmed up.
the bottle got stolen a few months ago and i'm running an APEXi kit on 5.5 pounds now, my intercooler comes tomorrow then it's 7 daily 10 track. I've hit a 9.4 in the 1/8 so far...shooting for some some high 13's soon. Point in case to all you tards that posted in the thread with your ls, gsr, and 5th gen preludes (i blow you guys away now)
the Spec V is bone stock still...he ran a 9.54 in the 1/8 mile. The driver (my friend matt) is possibly one of the best drivers i've seen. He pulls consistent 2.1's at the track on stock everything (even tires)
the RSX is a type S, it's been debadged. In that race he only had an injen CAI now he has a catback exhaust and hondata ecu reflash he is also in the 9.4's in the 1/8 mile.
those are all the facts just in case you guys were curious, no need to speculate.
__________________
2000 Civic Ex 5 spd Tafetta White. APEXi turbo, Blitz dual drive BOV, DSM 450s, SAFC, Si lookalike kit, black SI/GSR leather seats, tanabe g-power piping with N1 muffler. 15X6.5 Rota Steel Grey C8's with kumho 712's. Eibach sportline, all strut bars. Panasonic MP3 headunit, MTX amp, MB quart sub
14.1 @ 99 1/4 mile
9.19@79.94 1/8 mile 8psi intercooled
on old fmu setup
01 Nighthawk black Cl-S with Nav-Stock
Originally posted by RX7 Twin Turbo the spec v runs like high 15's...am i right, and the type s runs high 14s to low 15s, i didnt think spev V's were that fast
in most cases they are like a mid 15 stock....the one in the video hit a 15 FLAT bone stock, it's all in the driver
__________________
2000 Civic Ex 5 spd Tafetta White. APEXi turbo, Blitz dual drive BOV, DSM 450s, SAFC, Si lookalike kit, black SI/GSR leather seats, tanabe g-power piping with N1 muffler. 15X6.5 Rota Steel Grey C8's with kumho 712's. Eibach sportline, all strut bars. Panasonic MP3 headunit, MTX amp, MB quart sub
14.1 @ 99 1/4 mile
9.19@79.94 1/8 mile 8psi intercooled
on old fmu setup
01 Nighthawk black Cl-S with Nav-Stock
Originally posted by Jkan2001 that civic was actually mine....i was using a 55 shot Zex kit and my bottle pressure was really low and under 800 psi so i was probably only spraying like a 20 shot which does practically nothing. The kit is very finicky depending on bottle pressure. I raced that spec v (my friend matt) a bunch of other times and i usually put about 2 on him when i had a full bottle and it was warmed up.
the bottle got stolen a few months ago and i'm running an APEXi kit on 5.5 pounds now, my intercooler comes tomorrow then it's 7 daily 10 track. I've hit a 9.4 in the 1/8 so far...shooting for some some high 13's soon. Point in case to all you tards that posted in the thread with your ls, gsr, and 5th gen preludes (i blow you guys away now)
the Spec V is bone stock still...he ran a 9.54 in the 1/8 mile. The driver (my friend matt) is possibly one of the best drivers i've seen. He pulls consistent 2.1's at the track on stock everything (even tires)
the RSX is a type S, it's been debadged. In that race he only had an injen CAI now he has a catback exhaust and hondata ecu reflash he is also in the 9.4's in the 1/8 mile.
those are all the facts just in case you guys were curious, no need to speculate.
Amazing...nice car btw gotta love turbos.. and for your friends nice cars and the Spec V I'm glad that there are people on this board that realizes its faster then everyone thinks...argh..its not a high 15 sec car its a low 15 sec car... and the rsx-s with mods..wow one fast car.
Jason
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Arctic Blue Pearl
being an owner of a brand new '03 Spec V, I'm still breaking her in 500+ miles now, under 500 to go
no hard shifts, shifting @ 4500-4800 rpm, varying speeds, no clutch dumping, etc
but @ 4500 rpm, shifting from 1st-2nd and at times 2nd-3rd, the tires break traction(both do of course, LSD), but the torque power is insane, having owned a GS-R and a CTR powered Teg, I know the feeling of a nice vtec car, awesome top end, high revs kick ass, but equal or more torque than HP feels awesome, 5th and 6th power pulls, from 65-75, enough to pass someone respectfully, no real need to downshift.
but i've read of 1/4 times of 15.3-15.8
RSX-S of around 15.7-16.0, less torque, more HP, same amount of gears (6), no LSD, heavier by 40-100lbs depending on options, etc
driver to driver a RSX-S could take out a Spec V, and a RSX-S w/ an intake will bump up it's chances even more of taking out the Spec V that's stock, and I've still seen an RSX-S w/ a AEM CAI only run a 15.5, nice, but a Spec V can do that stock, I know that the RSX-S is more tuned for highway racing 'cuz I've driven one and they'r not that fun in the city, better on the highway, but my Spec V seems to fun no matter where I'm at 'cuz of the short gear ratios, smooth power and torque curve in town or out on the highway, in the straights or in the s-turns, it always seems to b happy to please, I loved my GS-R and the CTR engine setup, but this seems so much nicer...
So seeing the Spec V stock beat the RSX-S doesn't surprice me, nor would seeing it the other way around, but seeing a EX w/ I/H/E and a 55 shot not take the RSX-S or the Spec V? that confuses, but u know at times nitrous can b low, driver isn't shifting at the right times, etc
Street racing is a 50/50 shot, win or loss, but from what I can see if all 3 drivers were awesome and the cars had nothing wrong, and had what they had at the time of the race, my prediction is the EX in 1st, and the Spec V and the RSX-S at a tie, mayb the Spec V 'cuz of the LSD would overtake the RSX-S w/ a CAI, but not by much is my guess
Later,
Jay
__________________
'94 Teg "GSR" 4dr Forest Green-Smashed
CTR Motor and Tranny, Mugen ECU, V-AFC, Ground Controls, Tokico "Blues", Spoon FLTB, Skunk2 Front Strut and rear lower tie bar, Suspenion Techniques Rear sway bar, Tanabe rear strut bar, Comptech intake w/ Ice Box, etc
New toy='03 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V on 17" Te-37 in Mercury Silver
I/H/E/S-afc~162whp/176wtq; 14.7@93mph
Originally posted by InsnImprtGuy being an owner of a brand new '03 Spec V, I'm still breaking her in 500+ miles now, under 500 to go
no hard shifts, shifting @ 4500-4800 rpm, varying speeds, no clutch dumping, etc
but @ 4500 rpm, shifting from 1st-2nd and at times 2nd-3rd, the tires break traction(both do of course, LSD), but the torque power is insane, having owned a GS-R and a CTR powered Teg, I know the feeling of a nice vtec car, awesome top end, high revs kick ass, but equal or more torque than HP feels awesome, 5th and 6th power pulls, from 65-75, enough to pass someone respectfully, no real need to downshift.
but i've read of 1/4 times of 15.3-15.8
RSX-S of around 15.7-16.0, less torque, more HP, same amount of gears (6), no LSD, heavier by 40-100lbs depending on options, etc
driver to driver a RSX-S could take out a Spec V, and a RSX-S w/ an intake will bump up it's chances even more of taking out the Spec V that's stock, and I've still seen an RSX-S w/ a AEM CAI only run a 15.5, nice, but a Spec V can do that stock, I know that the RSX-S is more tuned for highway racing 'cuz I've driven one and they'r not that fun in the city, better on the highway, but my Spec V seems to fun no matter where I'm at 'cuz of the short gear ratios, smooth power and torque curve in town or out on the highway, in the straights or in the s-turns, it always seems to b happy to please, I loved my GS-R and the CTR engine setup, but this seems so much nicer...
So seeing the Spec V stock beat the RSX-S doesn't surprice me, nor would seeing it the other way around, but seeing a EX w/ I/H/E and a 55 shot not take the RSX-S or the Spec V? that confuses, but u know at times nitrous can b low, driver isn't shifting at the right times, etc
Street racing is a 50/50 shot, win or loss, but from what I can see if all 3 drivers were awesome and the cars had nothing wrong, and had what they had at the time of the race, my prediction is the EX in 1st, and the Spec V and the RSX-S at a tie, mayb the Spec V 'cuz of the LSD would overtake the RSX-S w/ a CAI, but not by much is my guess
Later,
Jay
actually....my nitrous bottle was pretty low but i went ahead and still ran em anyways. A i/h/e ex doesn't stand half a chance against a rsx-s or spec. The white spec in that vid is bone stock down to the tires and it hit a 15.0a few months ago. As far as i know it's the fastest stock spec with a timeslip.
__________________
2000 Civic Ex 5 spd Tafetta White. APEXi turbo, Blitz dual drive BOV, DSM 450s, SAFC, Si lookalike kit, black SI/GSR leather seats, tanabe g-power piping with N1 muffler. 15X6.5 Rota Steel Grey C8's with kumho 712's. Eibach sportline, all strut bars. Panasonic MP3 headunit, MTX amp, MB quart sub
14.1 @ 99 1/4 mile
9.19@79.94 1/8 mile 8psi intercooled
on old fmu setup
01 Nighthawk black Cl-S with Nav-Stock
very true a RSX-S, based off power to weight should b into the mid to low 15's, and w/ more torque than an b-series had stock, it should b there w/out a problem but i've yet to see, hear, or read of a stock RSX-S or a RSX-S w/ a CAI get into a low 15, not trying to b mean just saying i haven't seen, heard, read 'bout a RSX-S getting there
Later,
Jay
__________________
'94 Teg "GSR" 4dr Forest Green-Smashed
CTR Motor and Tranny, Mugen ECU, V-AFC, Ground Controls, Tokico "Blues", Spoon FLTB, Skunk2 Front Strut and rear lower tie bar, Suspenion Techniques Rear sway bar, Tanabe rear strut bar, Comptech intake w/ Ice Box, etc
New toy='03 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V on 17" Te-37 in Mercury Silver
I/H/E/S-afc~162whp/176wtq; 14.7@93mph
its preety tight but i've seen better
: So do u own a mr2? or a civic? huh? 
:
