kinda cool but thats wasnt anything like what a muscle car does, ill probably get crap for this but im a big muscle car guy and i have to disagree with the big FAIL over the mustang that is doing a much more impressive wheel stand then the honda.
Well let's see: Muscle cars have been around for nearly 50 years? Honda's have been around since the 1970's or so, and not one has ever been a muscle car, and the only ones that have arguably been true sports cars are the NSX and the S2000. The NSX was never designed to do that, it's engine bay is too cramped, parts are expensive, and tuning knowledge is hard to come by given the rarity of the car in relation to the number of muscle cars and people who work on them. Similar circumstances with the S2000. The S2000 didn't have a truly tunable ECU until Hondata in let's say 2006 as a guestimate, and i'm not sure NSX has any ECU tunability available. Essentially, they are two completely different designs for completely different demographics. Comparing them is apples to potatoes.
Which brings me to my next point, which is the fact that some d-bag put a mustang doing a wheelie as in inspiration poster stating that a Honda could never do that. The "FAIL" is the fact that one just did. How ironic? And it's a pretty amazing feet considering the first point. It has nothing to do with how much further up in the air the mustang is compared to the S2000. The real inspirational poster should have said something along the lines of "you're yugo/suzuki/opel/jaguar/etc. can't do this." Come to think of it, I've never seen a Ferrari/Lambo/Maseratti/Koenigsegg/Ariel/etc. do it either? Or what about AWD cars like Subaru/Audi/Mitsubishi? Again, apples to okra on the part of the turd who made the inspirational poster.
Lastly, with a s/n like "sheep", you should be more worried about people giving you crap about polygamist farmer joe kneeling behind you than about failing to see the differences between the wheelies.