Honda and Acura Car Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
238 Posts
Holy crap! :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
406 Posts
i could totally see that thing pimping down the street at 10 mph like a bad ass... :ninja
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39,372 Posts
haha-thats Awesome!! i love the R34, hence my avatar... nice find!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,160 Posts
gaurav33 said:
Looks like a parade because of the cops around too. Probably to do with the JGTC
awww i see a honda logo on the cop bikes..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,702 Posts
Shifty_56 said:
theres another one 2 cars back in the first pic. did they parade them all out on the streets or what?
there're probably more but i spot a R34 and R33...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39,372 Posts
ak47m203 said:
WHAT'S THE SPECS OF THAT CAR?
in stock form: (dont know about the one in the pic)
Engine Type: Inline-6, Twin-turbo
Displacement cu in (cc): 156 (2568)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 276(206) / 6800
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 216(293) / 4400
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 245/40 WR18
Driveline: All Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 181.1 × 70.3 × 53.5
Weight lb (kg): 3672 (1666)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 5.2
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250)
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,840 Posts
rnstein69 said:
in stock form: (dont know about the one in the pic)
Engine Type: Inline-6, Twin-turbo
Displacement cu in (cc): 156 (2568)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 276(206) / 6800
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 216(293) / 4400
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 245/40 WR18
Driveline: All Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 181.1 × 70.3 × 53.5
Weight lb (kg): 3672 (1666)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 5.2
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250)
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.
those numbers are highly under rated. RB26DETT redlines at over 8000 rpms. The power at the flywheel numbers for the RB26DETT are hovering around 330-350hp/290-320ft/lb. I've seen acceleration numbers for R34 GT-R V-Spec II 0-60mph at 4.5 sec, 1/4(400meter) at 12.4. So those numbers are way under rated
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39,372 Posts
ThirdLane said:
those numbers are highly under rated. RB26DETT redlines at over 8000 rpms. The power at the flywheel numbers for the RB26DETT are hovering around 330-350hp/290-320ft/lb. I've seen acceleration numbers for R34 GT-R V-Spec II 0-60mph at 4.5 sec, 1/4(400meter) at 12.4. So those numbers are way under rated
those numbers are just for the GT-R, not the v-spec2. of course the v-spec2 is a whole different animal as the specs that you have there reflect it acurately im sure, but as for base numbers or specs thats what the 1999 skyline base model starts at.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,840 Posts
rnstein69 said:
those numbers are just for the GT-R, not the v-spec2. of course the v-spec2 is a whole different animal as the specs that you have there reflect it acurately im sure, but as for base numbers or specs thats what the 1999 skyline base model starts at.
'base' GT-R and V-Spec II shared the same engine and its output. Only difference between the two were electronic awd geometry, little visual cues, and some suspension tuning. Other than that the core of the two cars engine, brakes, hardware were identical.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,840 Posts
even the base Skyline GT-S sedan's numbers were underrated by Nissan. They listed the RB25DET at like 220-230hp/1800-190tq which were underrated by about 20hp and tq. I have also seen R33 GT-R V-Spec 0-60 numbers at mid 4 seconds. I read some obscure japanese magazine where they dynoed a stock GT-R which made over 300hp at the wheels, which would equate to about 350hp at the flywheel. Back to the pics though, Nismo(Super GT) GT-R is a hot beast though my favorite will always be the yellow Nismo/Penzoil GT-R. And you can thank Gran Turismo for that :D
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top