Honda and Acura Car Forums banner
1 - 5 of 5 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
849 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
hey guys, sorry if this is already posted.. I did a search and found a couple posts regarding this issue, but the problem is, when i clicked on those posts, all i got were errors.. anyways, what's better? A rev hard stage 3 turbo, or a S/C with NOS?

the reason i'm asking is that a friend of mine is also doing a project with a 94 del sol, and he's putting a b16a2 in there while i'm putting a B18c1 into my 94 civic hb.. and well, we're just wondering which setup gives out more power? I know with the turbo you'll get lag, but there's gota be something in a S/C that makes it an alternative..

thanx.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,608 Posts
you said it... s/c has no lag. yet i will still choose turbo for your setup. since superchargers get its power by robbing hp from the crank its not as efficient as a turbocharger. besides, if you get a small turbo, like a t25, you won't notice the lag. turbo all the way
 

· Registered
Joined
·
849 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Ruckus138 said:
did u say rev hard stage III? are we talking about the same stage III? because that's some serious work...
are u building this car for the 1/4? street racing? road racing? grocery getter?
hey Ruckus, yeah we're talking about the same Rev Hard Stage III, i'm sinking alot of money into this car because I want to see how potent a 5th gen hb can be.. The main objective was to build it for a 1/4 mile, but i've also decided to make it a daily driven vehicle as well..
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top